PRIMI 事情出自这个帖子：https://tieba.baidu.com/p/7630471938?share=9105&fr=sharewise&see_lz=0&share_from=post&sfc=qqfriend&client_type=2&client_version=12.15.1.0&st=1638963841&unique=76CA42D18BD4495CE7F46BDD59F026A8&red_tag=2769120565
楼主@bdfzbqs 言之凿凿的说根据另外一份文献记载，卡罗尼亚会战是虚构的，就是一场突袭而已，根本没打成会战。这真是看的我天雷滚滚，而其所谓的另一份文献，是门农写的《赫拉克利亚史》23章13节的内容。原文如下：
“When Eretria, Chalcis and the whole of Euboea had gone over to Mithridates, along with other cities, and the Spartans had been defeated, the Romans sent out Sulla against him with a suitable army. 11 On his arrival, Sulla won over some cities which changed sides of their own will, and captured others by force, and he routed a large army from Pontus in battle. He also captured Athens, and the city would have been destroyed, if the senate had not quickly put a stop to Sulla's intentions. 12 There were many skirmishes, in most of which the men of Pontus had the upper hand, and the situation changed as a result of their successes. But the royal troops suffered from a lack of supplies, because they used up what they held recklessly and did not know how to preserve what they had acquired. They would have been in desperate trouble, if Taxiles had not captured Amphipolis, after which the rest of Macedonia went over to his side, and he was able to provide plentiful supplies.
13 Taxiles and Archelaus joined up their armies, so that they had over 60,000 men, and they took up position in the territory of Phocis, awaiting Sulla. Sulla received reinforcements from Lucius Hortensius, who brought more than 6,000 men from Italy, and camped opposite them at a considerable distance. While Archelaus' men were carelessly foraging, Sulla unexpectedly attacked his enemies' camp. He immediately killed the men whom he captured if they were strong, but he placed those from whom he had nothing to fear around the camp and told them to light fires, so as to receive those returning from foraging without giving them any suspicion of what had happened. This turned out as he planned, and Sulla's men won a brilliant victory.”
而这区区两段文字，就是苏拉参加的米特拉达梯战争的全部内容，其简略大家可以看出，这里面确实没有卡罗尼亚会战，然而也没有雅典攻城战和奥科美纳斯会战，按照作者一笔带过的写法，这场战争就是在许多的小冲突和苏拉奇袭阿基劳斯营地中结束的。
但这就很诡异了，按照这里的说法，小冲突还大多是本都人占据上风，怎么突然阿基劳斯就撤出雅典，一路东退，跑到营地里等待苏拉了？怎么一次营地被袭击就让苏拉大获全胜赢了战争了？难不成自知自己非仁义之师所以羞愧至死的？那么是不是这本书使用的材料要优于普鲁塔克和阿庇安？并非如此，门农也是一世纪的人，而且相比普鲁塔克明确提到的苏拉自己的回忆录，这位门农丝毫没有给出出处。所以你用作者时代差不多，毫无出处的简史，去否根据苏拉回忆录撰写的历史？而且这简史内容剥离详细版本后还完全不能自洽。是不是过于脑洞大开了点？原本打算回复在帖子里的，结果打完字被吞了，因此单开一贴，另外由于给出了出处，所以不作任何处罚，但是麻烦下次看wiki百科写帖子之前，看看自己引用的资料，过一过脑子。
楼主@bdfzbqs 言之凿凿的说根据另外一份文献记载，卡罗尼亚会战是虚构的，就是一场突袭而已，根本没打成会战。这真是看的我天雷滚滚，而其所谓的另一份文献，是门农写的《赫拉克利亚史》23章13节的内容。原文如下：
“When Eretria, Chalcis and the whole of Euboea had gone over to Mithridates, along with other cities, and the Spartans had been defeated, the Romans sent out Sulla against him with a suitable army. 11 On his arrival, Sulla won over some cities which changed sides of their own will, and captured others by force, and he routed a large army from Pontus in battle. He also captured Athens, and the city would have been destroyed, if the senate had not quickly put a stop to Sulla's intentions. 12 There were many skirmishes, in most of which the men of Pontus had the upper hand, and the situation changed as a result of their successes. But the royal troops suffered from a lack of supplies, because they used up what they held recklessly and did not know how to preserve what they had acquired. They would have been in desperate trouble, if Taxiles had not captured Amphipolis, after which the rest of Macedonia went over to his side, and he was able to provide plentiful supplies.
13 Taxiles and Archelaus joined up their armies, so that they had over 60,000 men, and they took up position in the territory of Phocis, awaiting Sulla. Sulla received reinforcements from Lucius Hortensius, who brought more than 6,000 men from Italy, and camped opposite them at a considerable distance. While Archelaus' men were carelessly foraging, Sulla unexpectedly attacked his enemies' camp. He immediately killed the men whom he captured if they were strong, but he placed those from whom he had nothing to fear around the camp and told them to light fires, so as to receive those returning from foraging without giving them any suspicion of what had happened. This turned out as he planned, and Sulla's men won a brilliant victory.”
而这区区两段文字，就是苏拉参加的米特拉达梯战争的全部内容，其简略大家可以看出，这里面确实没有卡罗尼亚会战，然而也没有雅典攻城战和奥科美纳斯会战，按照作者一笔带过的写法，这场战争就是在许多的小冲突和苏拉奇袭阿基劳斯营地中结束的。
但这就很诡异了，按照这里的说法，小冲突还大多是本都人占据上风，怎么突然阿基劳斯就撤出雅典，一路东退，跑到营地里等待苏拉了？怎么一次营地被袭击就让苏拉大获全胜赢了战争了？难不成自知自己非仁义之师所以羞愧至死的？那么是不是这本书使用的材料要优于普鲁塔克和阿庇安？并非如此，门农也是一世纪的人，而且相比普鲁塔克明确提到的苏拉自己的回忆录，这位门农丝毫没有给出出处。所以你用作者时代差不多，毫无出处的简史，去否根据苏拉回忆录撰写的历史？而且这简史内容剥离详细版本后还完全不能自洽。是不是过于脑洞大开了点？原本打算回复在帖子里的，结果打完字被吞了，因此单开一贴，另外由于给出了出处，所以不作任何处罚，但是麻烦下次看wiki百科写帖子之前，看看自己引用的资料，过一过脑子。
