首先感谢分享，记得盖茨在他最成功的演讲中曾经说过，慈善的意义在于平等，机会的平等，会让更多人有机会接受教育，拥有舞台，因此会为世界创造更多价值；但他也说过，生活是不公平的，要学会适应它。确实，很多权威著作也指出过，教育和后天环境对人有巨大的影响，这就是为什么众多伟大慈善家始终致力于提高教育水平的原因。记得钢琴教育家涅高兹曾说过，创造果园的最好方式就是找到最合适的土壤，很多问题就水到渠成了，如果非要在不合适的环境从头开始，那么工作量是巨大而低效的，与其说从培植土壤开始，不如直接找到一块最合适的土地。然而，理想条件并非总是会如愿以偿，鲁迅又说过，真的猛士，敢于直面现实。总之，一方面我们关注环境，另一方面我们让种子茁壮。比如法拉第和居里夫人，他们的成长过程并非一开始就具有理想的科研条件，甚至遇到了很多困难，但是他们并没有意味抱怨环境，而是改变和重塑了环境。
thank you for sharing,to begin with,i remembered in his famous speech gates once pointed out that the essence of charity is about equity,as we are creating stages for everyone,then,more talented people would have the opportunity to repay the world;however he also admitted that life is not fair,we have to get used to it.many renowed scholars have told us education and environment plays a major role to our growing,and this exactly why so many philathropists dedicated to improve the standard of education.newhause once came up with a metaphor,the best way to cultivate fruits is to find the best garden,if one insisted to start from zero,then the works would be immense and low efficency,compared with starting from nurturing the soil,why do not we just find a suitable garden at first?however,it is true that sometimes to get meet with ideal conditions is a fantasy,so we need to face the reality as luxun suggested.to sum up,we care about enviroment as much as we strengthening the seeds..taking curie and faraday as examples.they did not had a good environment,but instead of complain,they have changed and to some extent,reformed reshaped the environment they were in.
